Category Archives: Political

A Pigment of Imagination

It is a strange fate that we should suffer so much fear and doubt over so small a thing. Such a little thing.

Boromir may have been talking about the One Ring at the time, but oh how true this is for something else.  Melanin. defines melanin as “any of a class of insoluble pigments, found in all forms of animal life, that account for the dark color of skin, hair, fur, scales, feathers, etc.”  A pigment.  That’s it, the difference between you and anyone with darker skin than you is more pigment.  The difference between you and anyone with lighter skin than you is less pigment.  Melanin.

racecardRaces, they’re good at Daytona, and that’s pretty much it.  The whole idea that there are different “races” of men is a farce anyway, we’re all of one race, the race of Adam.  Which is to say, I am a human and guess what?  You are a human too.  Genetic ancestry can be traced back to a single person, or thing, depending on if you’re an evolutionist or a creationist. By the way, if you’ll notice, by that definition of melanin, animals also suffer from the inhumanity of some having less and some having more of this evil thing, melanin.  You don’t see them hating each other over it.  Then again I forget, they’re not rational humans like us.  Melanin also seems to be tricky to spot depending on who you are.  If you have something against large quantities of melanin or minuscule quantities of melanin, you’ll see those with the amount of your discontent as being inferior to yourself.  Which I find odd since you both have it, just in different amounts.  It’s like Coke hating Diet Coke.  Weird seeing two Cokes fight.  Seems kind of childish too.  True conservatives seem to forget there’s differences in the quantity of melanin that some may possess.  Sadly, liberals are there to remind them.  Liberals also tend to see melanin that would otherwise go unnoticed.  Such as claiming anyone that voted for Bush is a racist.  Or anyone opposed to Obama is a racist.  I haven’t been able to connect the dots yet, but I’m sure a liberal can help me out.  It seems, to the liberal, that a disagreement with someone on the basis of principle or ideology is grounds for racism.  I fail to understand a statement such as “…this has everything to do with a black man in office” when, as for me, it has nothing to do with melanin.  Alan Keys shares a similar melanin content count as Obama yet, I’d have no problems with Keys in the White House.  That does bring me to another point.  According to some liberals, if a person with a high melanin count opposes Obama, that person hates himself because of his own melanin concentration.   Do what?  A black man dislikes Obama so he’s a self hating black man?  This is what I mean by liberals being able to spot melanin better than anyone.  It never seems to be an issues until a liberal brings out that card.  They have no reservations in playing it.  They seem to spot melanin from a mile away.  Which leads me to make this statement and make it with confidence:  Liberals lean more toward racism than conservatives.

There are some other reasons for the different feelings toward melanin quantities in persons and it stems from an evolutionary root.  The belief that certain peoples who’s melanin content is in polar opposite of their own are somehow lesser humans because they evolved slower than another branch of humanity.  So they became half people.   Or more historically accurate, they were three fifths of a person.  Or, worse still, in other countries they weren’t considered people at all.  All because of melanin.  That is one form of racism.  Not the only form, but one form.

The Anti-Defamation League defines racism as:

“…the hatred of one person by another — or the belief that another person is less than human — because of skin color, language, customs, place of birth or any factor that supposedly reveals the basic nature of that person.”

By that definition, of which I would agree, racism is not simply an issue that stems from only one source but can come from anyone and from anywhere to anyone and to anywhere.  Racism itself is a misleading word.  You hear racism and think “skin color” or “race.”  But by definition, it’s discrimination based on many different things.  Which explains why I dislike the word “racism” so much.  I prefer discrimination.  If you treat someone hateful because of his skin color, it’s discrimination.  If you treat someone hateful because of his language, it’s discrimination.  If you treat someone hateful because of his customs, it’s discrimination.  If you treat someone hateful because of his place of birth, it’s discrimination.

Or “her”, for you gender sensitive readers out there.

A final statement, or question if you will.  How can we move past discrimination when we still use it to promote our agendas?  If I say I’m against Obama, do not first assume I’m racist.  It’s asinine!  I am opposed to his policies.  That is why I don’t like him.  If he was white, I’d still dislike him.  His melanin is not remotely involved in my feelings toward him and this constant habit of accusing opponents of racism is discrimination itself.  Calling someone racist based on no credible evidence and on purely an opinion or hate is discrimination.  You bear false witness of someone based on “any factor that supposedly reveals the basic nature of that person.”  And why?  So you can make yourself look better and higher than the other.  It’s the highest form of self absorbed narcissism.   And those that play the race card look like idiots and continue to show how much they hate their fellow man.


Obama and his Sheep: Two-Faced Lying Hypocrites

I have no respect for Barack Obama anymore.  I had very little to begin with but as of August 6th he hit zero on my respect-o-meter.  Obama came to my state for a fund raising event in support of Creigh Deeds (D), who is running for governor this year against Bob McDonnell (R).  Obama’s speech started off sounding like he wanted unity and ended in divisiveness with him telling those that “left him the mess” to shut up and get out of the way.  I’m sorry Obama, but last time I checked I’m free to voice whatever disdain I have for you or your policies so you can take it and like it.  William Hazlitt has the perfect description of you:

A hypocrite despises those whom he deceives, but has no respect for himself. He would make a dupe of himself too, if he could.

I have less than no respect for liberals in general.  They are the most hypocritical bunch of spineless dimwits I’ve ever had the underwhelming pleasure of meeting.  Over the past few weeks republicans, democrats, and independents from all over the country have been pissed off beyond belief at our government and have been going to town hall meetings and giving their non-representing representatives a well deserved earful and how does the left respond?  By calling them fake.  Fake protesters paid off by big insurance to complain about the messiahs perfect health care plan that he hasn’t even read.  Nancy Pelosi, basking in the nonexistent rays of her own intelligence, nonchalantly stated that these are not grass roots movements, but simply AstroTurf.  She also claimed some of those crazies were showing up with swastikas, which is completely false.  Produce a legitimate photo and I’ll eat my hat.

In the words of Mad Max; Swastikas and paid protesters my big ‘ol butt!  Hey liberals, productive members of society are not built of straw!  Or handouts for that matter.  No worries, they burn the straw men and…well they don’t do anything about the handouts, except increase them.  These liberals have the nerve to complain that some of these gatherings are “organized” and some of the protesters are paid and not genuine yet, the White House was pushing hard for communities to organize during Obama’s campaign.

Through Organizing for America, Americans across the country continue to organize in their communities and stand with President Obama to build support for President Obama’s agenda and hold Washington accountable to America’s call for change.The challenges we face can’t be solved by one person alone. We need you to get involved.

Well, we’re getting involved, and now we’re being attacked for it?  Oh, and get this nugget of liberal hypocrisy, people are being offered WAGES to help get Obama’s health care plan passed.  Surprise surprise, liberals expose another double standard.  Not only that, but the very people complaining about all this have a leader that was, before his political career took off, a community organizer with ACORN.  So don’t give me any crap about “organized” protests.  Yall wrote the book.

Now, supposedly, you libs wrote the book on tolerance too.  Here’s a quote from Obama’s  inaugural address:

Our challenges may be new. The instruments with which we meet them may be new. But those values upon which our success depends — hard work and honesty, courage and fair play, tolerance and curiosity, loyalty and patriotism — these things are old. These things are true. They have been the quiet force of progress throughout our history. What is demanded then is a return to these truths.

One would assume someone enamored of our president and all he stands for would champion his cause by applying those very values in their own lives, right?  Lets see these values in practice from a liberal activist:

Liberal tolerance in action.  She sounds, at times, to be quite intelligent, but as Susan Sontag once said, “Intelligence is really a kind of taste: taste in ideas.

It’s no wonder liberals are always talking crap.

Liberals and Their Double Standards. v. 1.0.0

doublestandardsCheck it out, I found a farm we can send all the liberals to.  They’ll feel right at home!  Anyway, I thought to just title all blogs involving liberal double standards the same and add a version number so as to keep track.  I’ve already written a few but as I’ve noticed…it never ends.  A title all it’s own and a category all it’s own.  Congratulations liberals!  You’re gaining exposure.  The latest in a long train of intellectual abuses involved the recent Town Hall meetings that have been, at most, heated.  I mentioned just yesterday about these angry Americans and there’s been quite a bit in the news since then.  I quoted a Youtube user that said the following:

Rumor has it that many of these so called protesters are mostly insurance lobbyists and insurance execs and insurance employees all given the day off to protest. How sad. Is this what the country has come to? A bunch of brown shirts disrupting meetings! Hitler would be proud………

Well as of last night I have another quote to show you.  This one is from a Twitter retweet I received:

the only ppl pissed off are paid FreedomWorks/Prosperity For America shills! Must be nice living in your world.

First thing I thought was obvious, if I’m pissed off at the Government, what makes you think it’s nice living in my world?  It’s far from nice and getting worse.  Being aggravated and angry at the way Obama and the left are destroying America leads you to make a “must be nice” condescending remark?  Also, the fact that I’m angry, and not a paid FreedomWorks/Prosperity for America shill, makes your comment false.  Now, besides the fact that nobody from the left has yet to make a rational comment regarding the issues Americans have with Obamacare, they are also ignorantly blind of the hypocrisy of opposing  what they believe are organized and paid protests.  “Well they have pre-made signs and orchestrated chants.”  You mean, like this?

Heh, this video was actually from an ACORN supporter via Youtube.  Matching hats?  Shirts?  Signs?  Hmm??  Organized maybe?  Orchestrated maybe?  So tell me, liberal “friend”, IF the asinine claims from the left were true and all the town hall protesters (which numbered at almost 10 thousand at one location) were organized or orchestrated, why do you have a problem with it?  ACORN does it all the time and you’re fine with that.  Why is it ok for them, but not for us?  OH, I forgot…double standards.  This anger we have is manufactured, but it’s being manufactured by the poison of liberalism.  We’ve had enough, we’re angry, and we’re not going to shut up.

Reality Bites: America is getting P.O.’d

realitybitesTime for recess, representatives!  Wahoo!  You finally get some time off to speak to your constituents!  You know, the people you work for.  Time to find out how they feel you are doing.  So, how’s it going?  What’s the report card from the collective say?  Hmm?  Lets take a peek a loo shall we?  Arlen Specter?  Kathleen Sebelius?  How’d it go?

Did you happen to see the paper the first woman was holding up?  It’s the health care “diagram”.  I have a copy, this is what she was talking about when she said, “What I see is a bureaucratic nightmare, Senator.”  (click it for an enlarged view)


What the frikk is all that mess?  Your elected officials hard at work…

Hmm, seems your people aren’t too happy.  Well, it’s not an isolated event.  People all over the country are fed up with this administration and the lefts agendas.  Of course, there are some insanely cracked leftists claiming these people at the town hall meetings are nothing more than groups being organized by corporate “puppet masters.”  Ha!  Right.  For real, this is an actual quote from a comment on Youtube regarding a video like this one:

Rumor has it that many of these so called protesters are mostly insurance lobbyists and insurance execs and insurance employees all given the day off to protest. How sad. Is this what the country has come to? A bunch of brown shirts disrupting meetings! Hitler would be proud………

For such intellectuals this borders on mental retardation.  Liberals let me ask you something: Do you ACTUALLY believe these protesters are staged actors from lobbyists and insurance execs?  You know what, better yet lets pretend that this statement is true.  How does it help their cause to SUPPORT Obamacare while claiming insurance employees are NOT in favor of it?  I don’t know maybe it’s just me but, I figure having insurance companies backing the plan would be a point of pride for the liberal, not a point of contention.  But anyway back to the original brilliant comment.  I love the first part: “Rumor has it..”  and then they proceed to finish out their thought as if it was fact.  Is this what liberals do?  Run with rumors?  Look, it’s simple, the American people are P.O.’d and the MSM and leftist elitists want to play it off as staged to give the impression that America isn’t actually against Obamacare.  These are just crazies!  These events are staged with crazies trying to give the impression that America is opposed to Obamacare!  I wonder if the polls are staged too.

Obama’s approval rating has been dropping for months.  Polls indicate that 48% of Americans think the health care system is fine with only 19% feeling it’s terrible.  A stark contrast to what the Obama administration and the leftist media is claiming but lines up perfectly with the feelings of the protesters at the town hall meetings.  Face it liberals.  The plan sucks.  Have you read it?  Would you like to?  I have a PDF copy of it.  Scroll down to page 425 I think it is.  Read about the end of life care.  Then, tell me you are ok with passing this.  Then do some soul searching, you just might find one.

Throw it in Reverse

unityI hear the phrase “reverse racism” and “reverse discrimination” thrown around a lot.  If I’m honest with myself, which I usually am, I’d admit it makes no sense whatsoever to me.  How is racism reversed?  If a white man calls a black man the N word, it’s racist.  If a black man calls a white man a “cracker”, it’s also racist (also notice how I can say cracker, but not…yep, you noticed.)  What, exactly, makes one of those scenarios qualify to be considered reverse racism?  These questions are rhetorical mind you, I know the answer, and I’m going to clue you in.  See, in America we have been indoctrinated into thinking that true racism is only white on _______ (insert preferred color/race here).  The white man has been holding the “whatever-color-the-liberals-want-votes-from-and-thus-convince-to-believe-they’re-victims” down.  Typically, according to Obama who is about as far left as you can lean without falling over (although he has been losing his balance of late.  I’m sure you noticed when he had his little health care reform press conference the other day.  Someone definitely did act stupidly) it’s the hispanics and blacks.  Now, have they had a lot of crap to deal with?  Sure, but who gets blamed for the low education levels and poor living conditions of some blacks and hispanics?  Who else?  White America.  White America….I don’t get that phrase either, last time I checked we had reds and yellows, blacks and whites.  I don’t care what percentage of which is here, America is an assimilation of everyone everywhere.  I for one could care less what color someone is.  Call me crazy but I judge a person by the content of their character, not the color of their skin.  The blame game the liberals and other leftists perpetuate in this country has led some to feel that racism is one sided.  That somehow it’s unidirectional.  This mindset has brought about this “reverse” culture which I believe is bogus.  Racism is evil no matter where it came from or where it’s directed.  It’s a product of blaming everyone around us for failings or under achievements and the result of the hidden evil of diversity.  Diversity is the very antithesis of America.  The very antithesis of unity.  Diversity separates and empowers through victimization and entitlement.  Bringing only specific groups together to rise up against other groups that don’t appreciate their differences.  Unity unites us despite our differences, it embraces us without regard to any characterizations.  We are one.  The fallacy of reverse racism only continues the belief that racism is a one way street and that it has an epicenter.  One could argue that the idea of racism originating from the white man is itself, racist.  Is there such a thing as reverse hatred?  What about reverse lying? Reverse cruelty?  No of course not.  We understand these things to be universal.  Anyone can hate, or lie, or be cruel to anyone else.  If the other person does it back, it’s the original act, it’s not “reversed.”  The honest conclusion is that there is no such thing as reverse racism or reverse discrimination and it’s evil no matter where it comes from.

Something to Hide

Did you hear about Obama and how people are skeptical about whether he is a natural born citizen or not?  Yeah, of course you have.  The libs are annoyed, obviously.  Anytime anyone questions anything legit about him, they freak.  How dare we question the messi….uhh president.  Is it just me, or could this whole issue be utterly and completley silenced with a simple “Hey guys, here’s my birth certificate!  My actual vault copy birth certificate!  See here?  I was born in America, so shut up already!”  Simple.  So, why hasn’t he done it?  The BEST he’s come up with is a digital copy.  I’ve got Photoshop too, want to be born in Paris?  I can make it happen.

There is a very real probability that he’s hiding something.  Think about it!  It’s very simple to shut up the right-wing nuts, just show us a real vault copy birth certificate.  I know it wouldn’t please all of us, some would claim “Well he took so long to show it, he was probably getting this fake one made to pass off as an original.”  There may be some grain of validity behind that but for me, I’d be satisfied.  If I walked into my local 7-Eleven to pick up a six pa…uh, stimulus package…I’d be asked for my ID.  Would a simple “Don’t worry, I’m over 21, here’s a picture of my ID on my phone here, see?  No worries.” pass?  Nope, they want the real deal.  What makes this any different?  I’m honestly asking, WHY would someone ignore something as important as this?  He would be constitutionally ineligible to continue serving as President and on top of that, all the decisions he’s made would be null and void.  Wow, think of how much bluer the sky would look if that came to be reality.  But the question of why is definitely something to think about.  Showing us the birth certificate is simple and would end it all.  So, why not do it?  Why ignore it?  Why pass it off as nonsense, unless he’s truly got something to hide.  What do you think?

What? More Double Standards?!?

I know, I know, I just wrote on double standards not that long ago, but it’s happening again.  There really isn’t much to say about this one as it’s pretty much self explanatory.  Remember Senator Barbara Boxer’s rant against Brigadier General Michael Walsh?  No spin, no opinion, just the facts:

During a hearing before her Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, she scolded the Brigadier General for, of all things, calling her “ma’am” instead of “senator.”  Apparently she was offended by it.  He started to answer one of her questions by saying “ma’am” but didn’t get to finish his statement, she interrupted with:

“You know, do me a favor.  Could you say ‘senator’ instead of ‘ma’am?  It’s just a thing, I worked so hard to get that title, so I’d appreciate it, yes, thank you.”

According to the guide Military Protocol: Uniformed Services General Walsh was perfectly respectful in addressing her as ma’am, something he would do for someone of a higher rank than himself.  For her to spew such an invective and scold him in public like she did was very disrespectful and showed no class.  And as the future would show, it’s not something she’s consistent in demanding.  One wonders why she would demand to be called Senator by the Brigadier General but not this next gentleman.

During an Environmental Public Works Committee meeting on “green” jobs, there is an exchange between Senator Barbara Boxer and chairman of the National Black Chamber of Commerce, Harry Alford.  Rush Limbaugh summed up the exchange (which I will post shortly) this way:

Now, let me translate here what’s happening.  The National Black Chamber of Commerce is  not all sold on this “green” energy business, and Barbara Boxer at the Environment and Public Works Committee, a hearing on “green” jobs, starts quoting all these other black groups while the witness at the time is the chairman of the National Black Chamber of Commerce, Harry Alford.  So she starts talking about the CEO of 100 Black Men of Atlanta and then the NAACP support, and how vital that is, and this guy’s offended by this. He said, “Other groups over me, other blacks over me? Why don’t you talk about Asians? It’s racial.”  She’s clearly stunned by this, Barbara Boxer is not used to people calling her a racist.

Now, regardless of the topic and the racial overtones of her talking points, I want you to watch the video and count how many times he called her ma’am, and then count how many time she demanded he call her senator instead.

By my count, he addressed her 4 times as “ma’am” instead of Senator, something she was previously upset about in the hearing with the Brigadier General.  So why the double standard?  I’m telling you, and I’ve been telling you, liberals are always showing their true colors.  Always showing these double standards.  Stay posted to my blogs, there’s bound to be more of the same and I will keep showing liberals for what they are.